Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

SF702 (HF809) would eliminate abortion coverage for Medicaid-insured women. A person’s source of health insurance shouldn’t determine whether or not they can access an abortion.

This bill would:
(1)    Discriminate against women based on the type of health insurance they have;
(2)    Challenge established law that ensures women will have access to the reproductive health care they need, regardless of financial situation.1   

However we feel about abortion, politicians shouldn’t be able to deny a woman’s health coverage just because she’s poor.

  • In states that do not provide Medicaid coverage for abortion, most low-income women still manage to obtain abortion.  Many are forced to divert money from living expenses such as rent, food, or utilities and other bills.  
  • Eliminating Medicaid coverage for abortion creates a two-tiered system in which lower income women do not have the same freedom to make their own health care decisions as those who can afford abortion.  

Coverage bans don’t end abortion, but they do push the procedure later into pregnancy.

  • In states that deny Medicaid coverage of abortion, studies have shown that women postpone the procedure by 2-3 weeks to scrape together the funds to pay for it.2   
  • An abortion would cost a woman on Medicaid nearly a third of her monthly family income.3

This bill would result in a costly, lengthy lawsuit for the state of Minnesota.

  • The Minnesota Supreme Court, in Doe v. Gomez, broadly interpreted the right to privacy and held that “the difficult decision whether to obtain a therapeutic abortion will not be made by the government, but will be left to the woman and her doctor.”  
  • Abortion opponents, themselves, agree that the only ways to reverse Doe v. Gomez would be for the Supreme Court to overturn its own ruling or for legislators to pass a constitutional amendment that would go to voters.4  This bill does neither.
  • North Carolina had to tap its emergency fund in 2016 to pay $1 million in attorneys’ fees after a law requiring a woman to view an ultrasound was ruled unconstitutional.5   
  • When a district court ruled that a Wisconsin law was an undue burden on women seeking abortion, the state agreed to pay $1.6 million in attorney fees and legal costs to the law’s challengers.6



1Women of State of Minn. by Doe v. Gomez, 542 N.W.2d 17 (Minn. 1995).
2Roberts SCM et al., Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States, Women’s Health Issues, 2014, 24(2):e211–e218, doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.003.
3Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Federal Reserve Board, Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2014, Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2015, http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/2014-report-economic-well-being-us-households-201505.pdf
4Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, “Minnesota’s Extreme Abortion Policy” fact sheet.
5Jarvis, Craig. “NC Must Dip Into Savings to Pay $1 million for Losing Abortion Ultrasound Case.”  The News and Observer. 30 March 2016. Web. 6 Feb 2017.
6Treleen, Ed. “State Agrees to Pay Planned Parenthood Lawyers $1.6 million for fees, other costs.”  Wisconsin State Journal. 7 Sept 2016. Web. 6 Feb 2017. 

Tags: minnesota

Join our virtual volunteering events!

Become a voice of progress for reproductive health.  Sign up and be a change maker.

Upcoming Events

Join Our Mailing List

Get the latest legislative updates, sexual and reproductive health news, and action alerts by subscribing to our email list.

Sign Up

This website uses cookies

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our Necessary Cookies as they are deployed to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.