Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

Introduced by Rep. Abigail Whelan (R-Ramsey) and Sen. Michelle Benson (R -Ham Lake), HF 3194/SF 2849 would require providers to offer patients the option of viewing an ultrasound prior to an abortion.

UPDATE 5/16/18: This bill passed in both the Minnesota House of Representatives and the Minnesota Senate. It was sent to Governor Mark Dayton's desk, where it was vetoed.

Patients already have the right to view their ultrasound. That’s not what this bill is about. This bill is about legislating the conversation that takes place between a doctor and a patient – which sets a dangerous precedent.

Doctors, not politicians, should determine the health care needs of patients.

In case that wasn’t obvious, leading health care organizations, such as the American Medical Association, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Women’s Medical Association and the American Public Health Association oppose legislation that imposes specific requirements for medical procedures because these requirements interfere with the doctor-patient relationship.

In Minnesota, the Minnesota Section of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (MN ACOG) and the Minnesota Medical Association (MMA) both oppose this bill. Governor Mark Dayton has also voiced his opposition.

This type of interference in the patient-doctor relationship is more and more common as state legislatures around the country pass similar laws – a practice which, in a recent issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, the nation’s major leading medical organizations denounced as “inappropriate legislative interference” and noted that lawmakers “increasingly intrude into the realm of medical practice, often to satisfy political agendas without regard to established, evidence-based guidelines for care.”

Patients deserve their physicians’ best medical judgment and counsel, not unnecessary requirements mandated by politicians.

Despite opponents’ claims, this bill is NOT about patient’s right to know all the medical information before they make a decision. Patients already have that right. This bill is about shaming a person for their decision to end a pregnancy because it assumes they has not carefully thought about the decision.

Tags: minnesota

Solidarity Day

Every year on Good Friday, anti-Planned Parenthood protesters descend on the Planned Parenthood clinic at Vandalia Street in Saint Paul to shame and intimidate patients. They can have their protest. We’re going to have a rally. Join us Friday, April 19 from 10 a.m. until 3 p.m. to stand in solidarity and celebration as we proudly show the world that Planned Parenthood is here for good. RSVP in advance and you'll get an exclusive button when you check in!

RSVP

Fight Back Against the Title X Gag Rule

The Trump-Pence administration's Title X gag rule would block access to birth control, cancer screenings, and other basic care that Planned Parenthood patients rely on. Take action by a sending message to the elected officials that represent you to encourage them to vote in favor of HF 1011 / SF 1293, a bill that will increase funding for the state-based Family Planning Special Projects (FPSP) grant and help offset the impact of this dangerous rule.

Send your message

Become a Volunteer

Sign up to volunteer with the Planned Parenthood Action Fund in Minnesota. Volunteers help elect Planned Parenthood champions, advance reproductive health legislation, educate and engage the public around our services and our political work, and more. By becoming a volunteer, you will play an integral role in ensuring access to reproductive health care. 

Volunteer

Planned Parenthood Action Fund Disappointed in Minnesota Lawmakers’ Misplaced Priorities

St. Paul, MN – March 20, 2018 - The Minnesota House of Representatives’ Health and Human Services Reform Committee advanced HF 3194, which requires health care providers to offer patients the option of viewing an ultrasound prior to an abortion. This bill is unnecessary since women already have the option to view an ultrasound prior to an abortion. The legislation interferes in the relationship between a patient and her doctor, putting politics where it doesn’t belong.

Read Statement