Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

On March 23 — the Affordable Care Act’s sixth anniversary — the Supreme Court is hearing an oral argument from bosses trying to block women from the very promise the ACA made to them: birth control coverage without a copay.

In the case, known as Zubik v. Burwell, the Court will decide whether all of the more than 55 million women nationwide who now have access to no-copay birth control will retain that hard-won benefit — or if certain bosses can, once and for all, take away employees’ access to birth control.

What the Case is All About

Simply put, faith-based nonprofits are arguing over whether they must do basic paperwork.

Sure, some employers have legitimate religious objections to contraception. That’s why the Obama administration created an accommodation (i.e., workaround) for religiously affiliated nonprofits for the ACA’s birth control provision. This accommodation permits those nonprofits to carve out coverage, but still requires insurance companies to cover birth control without a copay.

Here’s how the accommodation works:

  • Bosses can express their religious objection to contraception.
  • Bosses fill out a one-page form or notice that states their objection to providing birth control coverage.
  • Insurance companies provide the birth control coverage and communicate directly with employees.
  • Employees access the health care they need at no additional cost.

Simple, right? But the faith-based organizations in the Zubik case oppose birth control so much that they don’t even want to fill out the form set up just for them — the very same form that enables them not to cover birth control.

ACA: The Country’s Historic Health Reform Has Made Historic Strides in Women’s Health

To fully understand the impact that a bad Supreme Court ruling could have for women, it’s important to understand the strides that the ACA has made. Because of the ACA, for the first time in American history every insurance plan is required to provide certain preventive care with no out-of-pocket costs for all enrollees. For women, that preventive care includes all FDA-approved methods of contraception, as well as services like breast and cervical cancer screenings, well-woman exams, prenatal care, and breastfeeding supplies.

Thanks to the ACA, America has made tremendous gains for women’s health and lives. Just two take-home stats:

  • The ACA expanded access to no-copay birth control to more than 55 million women —  an extraordinary achievement.
  • The ACA has saved women an estimated $1.4 billion a year on birth control pills alone — showing the clear economic impact that access to copay-free birth control has on women’s lives.

But all that progress is at risk with Zubik in the Supreme Court.

Hobby Lobby Déjà Vu

Does all this sound familiar? That’s because the devastating Hobby Lobby decision let bosses of some for-profit companies deny birth control coverage to their employees.

The Zubik case could go a step further. Here’s how:

  • In response to the Hobby Lobby ruling, the Obama administration created a rule so that employees at companies like Hobby Lobby could still get no-copay birth control directly from insurance companies — just as the administration previously did for religiously affiliated nonprofits.
  • Zubik v. Burwell could COMPLETELY strike down this accommodation, leaving women whose bosses oppose women's health without any access to birth control coverage.

That’s how big this case really is.

Whereas anti-birth control bosses might want you to think this case is just about a small group of nuns, the reality is that Zubik v. Burwell could have far-reaching implications at huge organizations that cover thousands of people’s health insurance — like the staff and students at Catholic universities and colleges. The ruling could also impact other areas of the law, like non-discrimination protections or criminal prosecutions.

With so much at stake, it’s no wonder that Planned Parenthood Federation of America and many other groups committed to equality for women filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the birth control coverage requirement and accommodation.  This brief joined dozens of others filed by members of Congress, medical providers, LGBT groups, faith-based groups, students, and others.

Tell Bosses: #HandsOffMyBC!

In June we’ll hear the verdict in Zubik v. Burwell, which is actually one of several consolidated cases brought by religiously affiliated nonprofits that object to the birth control accommodation. In the meantime, here’s what you need to remember: This case is not about religious freedom. It is about limiting women’s access to health care. 

So, while we celebrate the sixth anniversary of historic health care reform, it is more important than ever to demand that where you work should NOT determine whether or not you have access to affordable birth control.

Agree? Then tweet #HandsOffMyBC, and share this post on Facebook!

Tags: Obamacare, Hobby Lobby, Supreme Court, birth control

Is Abortion Still Legal in My State?

Learn about abortion access changes in your state.

Get the Facts

Demand court reform now!

To protect and advance our rights, we must reclaim our federal courts. 
Structural, systemic, and meaningful court reform is the only way to ensure that courts uphold the law and protect our rights.

Add your name

Planned Parenthood Action Fund Will NEVER Back Down

Know this: our right to abortion is not debatable. We will rebuild and reclaim the freedom that is ours.


Sign Up for Email

Sign Up

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our Necessary Cookies as they are deployed to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.