Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

Since the clinic shutdown law passed in 2013, Texans have been traveling hundreds of miles, crossing state lines, and waiting weeks to get an abortion, if they could get one at all. The impact was  catastrophic: Some women waited  long as 20 days to access abortion in the state.

Meanwhile, a November 2015 study found that at least 100,000 Texas women between 18-49 had  tried to end a pregnancy on their own without medical assistance at some time in their life. Abortion self-induction in Texas appears to be more common among Latinas near the U.S.-Mexico border and among women who report barriers accessing reproductive health services.
 

What The Impact of a Bad Decision Could Have Been

The stakes in this case cannot be overstated. If the Supreme Court had upheld Texas’ clinic shutdown law:

  • 5.4 million Texas women of reproductive age would have been left with at most nine health centers that provide safe, legal abortion in the entire state — down from about 40 health centers before HB2’s passage.
  • Wait times at Texas’ remaining health centers could have increased dramatically, forcing longer delays that could double the percentage of abortions in the second trimester.
  • The number of women who self-induce abortions could have increased. Women are more likely to take matters into their own hands if they encounter barriers to reproductive health services.

If that’s not an undue burden, we don’t know what is.

We and our third partners use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

We, and our third-party partners, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our Necessary Cookies as they are deployed to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.

Marketing

On

We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.

User Feedback and Session Replay

On

We use qualitative data from LogRocket, UserZoom, Hotjar and AB Tasty to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services. LogRocket allows us to view session replays.