Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

The U.S. Supreme Court case Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (formerly v. Cole) centered on two provisions of the clinic shutdown law:

  1. A mandate that all health centers that provide abortions comply with onerous and medically unnecessary building requirements for hospital-style ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), and
  2. A requirement that doctors who provide abortions obtain hospital admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

These requirements had nothing to do with patients' health and everything to do with shutting down abortion providers. In fact, medical experts like the American Medical Association and American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists opposed this law because it didn’t improve safety — just the opposite. It hurt people by blocking access to safe medical care.

For proof of the real motives behind the law, just look at anti-abortion politician David Dewhurst's 2013 tweet about the Senate version of Texas’ clinic shutdown law:

Remember: Abortion has a 99% safety record.

Remodeling a health center to become an ASC is medically unnecessary and expensive — it involves complex HVAC systems, down-to-the-inch dimensions for operating rooms, and specifications for outfitting janitor’s closets. The result of such restrictions is simply fewer providers.

Same thing goes for admitting privileges:

Abortion providers already have plans in the rare case of an emergency to ensure patient safety. Forcing them to obtain admitting privileges can set up a catch-22 if the only local hospital is hostile to abortion access due to its religious affiliation or political pressure — reasons that have nothing to do with quality of medical care.

“This victory gives us the opportunity to march state by state, legislature by legislature, rule by rule, bill by bill, and reclaim women’s health and rights across the country, 100%, no burdens on any woman, anywhere.”

— Dawn Laguens, Executive Vice President, Planned Parenthood Action Fund


This website uses cookies

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our Necessary Cookies as they are deployed to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.