Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

Kansas Tops a Growing List of States Facing Hefty Fees for Extreme Agenda

NEW YORK — As state legislatures across the country convene for the 2014 session, taxpayers in several states hostile to women are facing mounting bills from costly legal battles related to dangerous, unconstitutional restrictions on women’s health care.  This week, for example, the Associated Press reported Kansas’ anti-women’s health docket has cost taxpayers more than $1 million.

Statement from Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Action Fund:

“The Tea Party politicians who promised to rein in state budgets and boost the economy are wasting taxpayer money to jam through unprecedented restrictions on birth control and abortion.  It is appalling that state representatives are wasting taxpayer dollars litigating deeply unpopular restrictions and defending laws that would restrict low-income women’s access to lifesaving cancer screenings, birth control and other preventive health services at Planned Parenthood health centers.

“Politicians have already left Kansans with a million dollar tab for their extreme agenda, but politicians in Topeka appear poised to consider even more restrictions on women’s health this year.

“Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s office has reportedly spent $650,000 defending recent Texas laws that harm women’s health including laws that have shut down women’s health centers and barred low income women who rely on Planned Parenthood health centers from accessing preventive health care.

“Arizona has already spent about as much money on legal fees as it spends to provide 3,000 low-income women with birth control, lifesaving cancer screenings and other basic health care at Planned Parenthood Arizona — and now the state has asked the Supreme Court to review the case, which will cost taxpayers even more.


According to reporting by the Associated Press, Kansas has paid private law firms more than $1 million to defend anti-abortion laws enacted since 2011.

According to reporting by RH Reality Check, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s office has spent nearly $650,000 in taxpayer money on litigation defending extreme restrictions on women’s health.

North Dakota has allocated $400,000, to defend the extreme abortion restrictions enacted in 2013.  This is on top of the tens of thousands of dollars already spent litigating several other abortion restrictions that have been struck down by state courts.  

A case challenging an Arizona law to exclude Planned Parenthood health centers from the state’s Medicaid program has cost taxpayers approximately $279,000 in legal fees alone; in contrast, Planned Parenthood Arizona received about $350,000 in reimbursements for health care for about 3,000 Medicaid patients in 2012.  To date, four federal courts, two trial courts and two courts of appeals have looked at whether states can exclude providers of safe and legal abortion from their Medicaid programs, and all have agreed that federal law prohibits them from doing so.  The Supreme Court denied review of one of these cases in 2013 and yet Arizona has asked the Court to review its case.



This website uses cookies

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our Necessary Cookies as they are deployed to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.