Go to Content Go to Navigation Go to Navigation Go to Site Search Homepage

WASHINGTON, DC -- Planned Parenthood Action Fund has issued the following statement in response to a New York Times report that the U.S. District Court nomination of Michael Boggs will likely not move forward, according to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT). Planned Parenthood Action Fund joined a diverse coalition in opposing Boggs’ nomination due to his troubling record and agenda on women’s health and other issues in the Georgia General Assembly.

Planned Parenthood Action Fund president Cecile Richards released the following statement today:

“We welcomed today’s report that Michael Boggs’ nomination is ‘dead.'  With attacks on a woman’s fundamental right to safe, legal abortion from anti-women’s health legislators at the federal and state levels at an all-time high, the need for balanced courts with judges that take a fair-minded approach to the issues that come before them has never been greater. We applaud the Senate Judiciary Committee and Chairman Leahy for taking into consideration a growing list of concerns from a variety of organizations, spanning women’s health, civil rights, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender equality, about the Boggs nomination.  This should send an important message that nominees who hold extreme views cannot get the votes for a lifetime position in the federal judiciary.

“As the leading women’s health care advocate, we see the critical role that courts play in protecting and upholding a woman’s constitutional right to privacy, including privacy when she is considering safe and legal abortion. All nominees to the federal bench should be closely scrutinized to determine if they will take a fair-minded approach to the issues that come before them.

While in the Georgia General Assembly, Boggs cast votes that would have turned back the clock on women’s access to safe and legal abortion and birth control and endangered doctors. Boggs also co-sponsored legislation that would have directed funds to organizations intent on shaming and judging women facing deeply personal and often complex decisions about their pregnancies. It is Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s opinion that Boggs’ personal views on abortion would have interfered with his ability to follow Supreme Court precedent and the Constitution.

In February, Planned Parenthood, alongside nearly 30 organizations, signed on to a letter opposing the Boggs nomination. The letter reads, in part:

“During his time as a legislator in the Georgia General Assembly, Boggs demonstrated a troubling lack of concern for individuals whose experience and personal history differ from his own, creating a record that lacks a demonstrated commitment to fairness and equal justice with respect to issues of reproductive freedom, civil rights, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) equality.”


This website uses cookies

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors use cookies and other tools to collect, store, monitor, and analyze information about your interaction with our site to improve performance, analyze your use of our sites and assist in our marketing efforts. You may opt out of the use of these cookies and other tools at any time by visiting Cookie Settings. By clicking “Allow All Cookies” you consent to our collection and use of such data, and our Terms of Use. For more information, see our Privacy Notice.

Cookie Settings

Planned Parenthood cares about your data privacy. We and our third-party vendors, use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to collect, store, monitor, and process certain information about you when you access and use our services, read our emails, or otherwise engage with us. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device. We use that information to make the site work, analyze performance and traffic on our website, to provide a more personalized web experience, and assist in our marketing efforts. We also share information with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners. You can change your default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our Necessary Cookies as they are deployed to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information, please see our Privacy Notice.



We use online advertising to promote our mission and help constituents find our services. Marketing pixels help us measure the success of our campaigns.



We use qualitative data, including session replay, to learn about your user experience and improve our products and services.



We use web analytics to help us understand user engagement with our website, trends, and overall reach of our products.